Failure in Generalship

Tom Ricks writes this morning in the Washington Post about a Army Lieutenant Colonel who has written a blistering attack on the Generals in our military in Armed Forces Journal.

Lt. Col. Paul Yingling, who served in Iraq with the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, makes the argument that the Army's senior generals have failed by a) focusing their planning on conventional maneuver warfare, b) not preparing their troops for what they really have to face, and c) not warning either the President or the public what the realities are in terms of what will actually be required for victory in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The discussion on the Small Wars Journal discussion board so far is focused on what the impact is likely to be on LTC Yingling's career. I'm keeping an eye out, because I'm curious what the assessment is of the professionals on this question. Should be interesting.

From the Post:

Yingling said he decided to write the article after attending Purple Heart and deployment ceremonies for Army soldiers. "I find it hard to look them in the eye," he said in an interview. "Our generals are not worthy of their soldiers."

Related entries

 Buy 2 Favorite Paperbacks, Get the 3rd Free 234x60

Replies:

27 Apr 2007
The saddest part is that LTC Yingling is addressing the EXACT same thing was identified after Vietnam. The failure of senior leadership were chronicled in such books as "Crisis in Command" and "Death of the Army," as well as many others.



I don't know why it is, but for some reason at a particular point in a military career the individual becomes less focused on the profession and more focused on maintaining the institution and job. (This isn't unique to the officer corps either. Careerism is alive and well in the NCO Corps too.) This focus on career and institutionalism stifles innovation and creativity from subordinates. LTC Yingling is absolutely correct when he states that general/flag level officers must be held accountable for their actions. His statement that a private is held more accountable than a general officer is particularly accurate. (Especially in light of what happened at Abu Ghraib. It is still mind boggling that the troops were punished, but not the leadership.) I wish the man well. The article may be a career killer for him, but it does need to be said. It should be mailed to every member of Congress.
27 Apr 2007
Charles Sheehan-Miles
I have to agree. However, it's important to point out that this particular failing is not unique to the military -- I've certainly seen it happen in the corporate world, where decisions were made at the top level that were completely counter to the success of the company.



What hurts when it happens to the military is that the stakes are so much higher -- and its the young men and women at the tip of the spear who suffer for those decisions.

Post reply:

Name:

Email: Display my email

Post Title:

Reply:


To help us prevent spam, please enter the text in the above image exactly as it appears:

Registration

Register Me:

Subscribe to:

Quarterly Announcements

Insurgent Chapters

Notify me of replies